Simplest-shop.comonline shopping, the simple way |
Welcome | Help ![]() |
| Search for |
|
Home > Classical Music > Featured Performers, A-Z > ( O ) > Donizetti Lucia di Lammermoor Sutherland Pavarotti Milnes Ghiaurov ROH Covent Garden Bonynge
This website will be shutdown on 2008-04-01.
|
|
Donizetti - Lucia di Lammermoor / Sutherland · Pavarotti · Milnes · Ghiaurov · ROH Covent Garden · Bonynge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
| 80% Recommended by our customers. Label: Decca Catalog: Music Release date: 1985-08-12 Media: Audio CD discs number: 3 Format: Box set Ean: 0028941019325 Upc: 028941019325 Artists:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top stores | Description | Price | Link to shop |
| amazon.com | Availability: in 24 hours | $50.98 | |
| used | 16 used offers, as low as... | $23.99 | see more used offers |
| all new | 41 thirdParty new offers, as low as... | $29.99 | see more ThirdParty new offers |
| Professional Review: |
| This was Joan Sutherland's second recording of Lucia, made with an all-star cast in prime vocal condition, and it is a must for those who believe that bel canto opera should live up to its descriptive title: "beautiful singing." In the 10 years since her first Lucia recording, she had settled more comfortably into the character and become even more expert in the music. Her costars are among the greatest singers of our time, a point that is particularly important in the ensemble singing. Maria Callas is more dramatic, and her Lucia is a must for Callas fans, but this set is a joyful celebration of the glory of the human voice. In purely musical terms it is the best-sung Lucia on record. --Joe McLellan |
| User Reviews: |
|
Summary: My favorite of the many I have This is my favorite version of this opera, and I have many recordings with Lilly Pons, Sills, Caballe, Scotto, Muffo, a couple of Callas (one even live) and French version with Mady Mesple, and a few others with forgettable singers, and a recording with it on authentic instruments in the original keys (very exciting really, especially since the cadenzas are not those we are familiar with but authentic ones sang by Lucias of Donizetti's time --- very different and very beautiful) and I love them all, though only this, the Sills, the authentic recording, and the Caballe are actually complete versions of the opera, all the others leave out many scenes as was the tradition of the time. I like the opera to be complete. I know that in times past there were traditional cuts used, but quite often those cuts actually ruined the dramatic punch of the whole. Lucia gets reduced to a few arias for everyone else, and the big mad scene and nothing more. This one is complete. The Sills recording uses Donizetti's original thoughts of the glass harmonica in the mad scene in place of the flute, but the flute works just fine here. Added touches in this recording one won't find in others is the beautiful harp cadenza in Lucia's first aria. I assume that Sutherland's husband wrote the cadenza and does it ever add to the beauty of the scene. I find Sutheland's diction acceptable in this recording, and her habit of scooping (which will really become pronounced by the time she records Anna Bolena) is at a minimum. What is so wonderful in this recording is the fact the cast are all equal to the task at hand. That is the biggest draw backs with many of the Lucia recordings I have; the casts are uneven, while the soprano can get through it, the rest of the cast barely can. The voices all blend extremely well together. Sutherland is older, and perhaps more mature than the role's correct age (but if you really look at it, no singer is the bright 16 year old the opera and the novel talk about, except maybe when Patti sang it), but to me that means nothing. She is wonderful and adds so much to the role. There is so much talk about the DRAMA of Lucia, when in reality, there are very few places where she is actually in some fit or other. Even though the mad scene begins with violence (off stage she stabs her husband 37 times and in the book is found in the fireplace playing with a ribbon), by the time Lucia is before her guests she is no longer violent, but a weak, delicate creature totally overwhelmed by the heaviness of life. She lives in her pretend world of love and light (and with a few phantoms). I find the Callas portrayal not so much dramatic as tragic. It has the nobility of some great Greek Tragedy, very wonderful and moving; yet, the Lucia of Walter Scott's novel is not noble (her family is actually in ruin, that is why in the book her mother forces her marriage, in the opera her brother), she is not a "tragic" figure in the sense we think of it; she is a pathetic creature whose unhinged mind is the result of being manipulated by everyone around her. She is NOT a self determined person. I think Sutherland captures that aspect of Lucia in spades. Few singers really seem to understand that this is not a Norma who sings runs, this character is a weak, easily manipulated, guilt ridden character incapable of any self-direction. Her only escape from a life she doesn't want is not standing up for herself, but to go mad. And that she does. Milnes is fabulous as the "evil brother." Actually, he isn't as evil as most think. All he is thinking about is keeping the family honor and some fortune (which will actually benefit himself and his sister in the long run). Arranging marriages like that was normal for the times, and I am sure the man Lucia married knew full well the purpose behind the arrangements. Yet, in the opera (as in the novel) he is not a bad man, he would actually be a good match for her (if she could ever get that "Ratcliff type character she loves" out of her head and heart). Lucia loves dangerously. Sure, in the novel, Edgardo saved her from a rushing bull (we don't learn about that in the opera), but that is no reason to love him (after all, he is a strange melancholy man who is in total ruin, and is ruined by society at large; in the novel he dies by drowning in the quicksand of the marshes), but he is completely unstable. Pavarotti is not noted for his character portrayal; most of the time we just accept his glorious voice. Here, he does give a good account of the ardor of this man, and even a touch of his instability. This is still my favorite recording, and it has much to recommend it. I love the other recordings I have too, but for various reasons. By the way, Donizetti was not the only composer to write a Lucia opera, a number of composers did, and most are far more faithful to the novel (Donizetti leaves out the "witchcraft" aspects which are extremely pronounced in the book). If you should find any of those on record, it would be interesting comparision to see how a great composer treated the story verses those other composers who composed it at the same time he did. Summary: Beauty and Drama Joan Sutherland, Luciano Pavarotti, Sherrill Milnes, and Richard Bonynge, who made such an outstanding team in London/Decca's 1971 RIGOLETTO, are just as great in this LUCIA DI LAMMERMOOR, recorded the same year. Bonynge, one of the most famous of all bel canto maestros, has total mastery of Donizetti's score. As much as I admire Maria Callas and (today) Ruth Ann Swenson in the role, Joan Sutherland is without a doubt my favorite Lucia. Surely no other soprano in history has sung the music with such a combination of vocal power, phenomenal agility, and incredibly pure tone. Sutherland's top notes are huge; at the end of "Quando rapito in estasi" and the Mad Scene, one can well believe that the Heavens are "opening up" for Lucia ("si schiuda il ciel per me"). For me the most amazing moment in Sutherland's performance is the powerful high note with which she ends Act II (CD #2): hearing it, one can easily believe that Lucia has gone mad. As for the claim that Sutherland's singing lacks "character," I can only repeat what a previous reviewer said: that (particularly in bel canto opera) the "character" is IN THE MUSIC. Therefore, when the music is sung with both beauty of tone and dramatic commitment (as it is here), its "character" (that is, the character that the composer has written into it) will emerge. Listening to this recording, it is easy to hear why Sutherland is more often than not considered the definitive Lucia di Lammermoor. Pavarotti as Edgardo sings magnificently, especially in his final scene. As in RIGOLETTO, his and Sutherland's voices blend beautifully; he really was the perfect partner for her in the bel canto repertory (just as he was for Mirella Freni in Puccini's operas). Milnes is an absolutely first-rate Enrico, a role that too often is undercast. Bass Nicolai Ghiaurov sings the role of Raimondo, Lucia's "spiritual advisor," and he brings to his music a gravity, a warmth, and a smoothness of line that recall the legendary Italian bass Ezio Pinza. The recorded sound is fully up to London/Decca's superb standards. When Lucia enters in the Mad Scene, her voice seems to come from a distance, as though overheard: an eerie effect indeed. And, last but not least, the opera is performed uncut, making one realize how masterful a creation it really is: "in its way as dramatic as LA TRAVIATA" (Christopher Raeburn's words in the CD booklet). Summary: My review of Sutherland's second Lucia Before I start praising this great recording I'd like to mention a few things: I know about several people who are using several IDs to push the reviews up here, that they appear to be most useful. They're doing Dame Joan a disservice by supporting reviews that are lacking knowledge or are downright malicious towards other great artists. If a review holds just ONE critical comment it's pushed down by the extreme fanatics here. I love Callas and Sutherland but I'm ASHAMED to see what is going on here. Fanatism is horrible and serves no one. Justice does. I own four Lucias with Sutherland and six with Callas. I love them. Now you may push down my review as well, I'm sure that it'll be like 1/68 people found it useful. That just confirms my theory. To all buyers of this recording: Beware of fanatism, just enjoy this FABULOUS recording. Summary: To "Charlie" I understand that you want to help make amends among fans of all 3 of our bel canto ladies CSS (Callas, Sills, Sutherland; having typed those three names together so often, I'm justing going to abbreviate), but stop this terrible bashing that you yourself are committing. What do I mean? You're parading the fact that Sills fans have apologized and now you're putting them in center square, shouting into a megaphone "they're the culprits!", humiliating them! THAT kind of "bashing" is 100 times more hurtful than reading a bashing review of my favorite lady of the opera. Sills fans have had the guts to own up to their wrong-doing. Isn't that enough? Have the Sutherland camp done the same? You are well aware that there are Sutherland fans who have done some NASTY things of their own, on both Sills sites and Callas sites. Are they owning up to those deeds? No. Have Sills fans owned up? Yes. So stop your burning-at-the-stake words directed at Sills fans. And what makes you think there's a single Sills fan doing it all? You constantly say "THE basher, THE one". So does it mean that if I apologize, I'm the only person responsible? And it doesn't mean if I apologize, Sills fans are the only ones who have participated in this diva war. So unless Sutherland fans confess to their own sins, stop making it look like Sills fans are the bad guys! Summary: Sutherland and Pavarotti! Bravissimo! Along with the very famous "Daughter of Regiment" starring Sutherland and Pavarotti, this Lucia contains some of the most beautiful display of bel canto singing I've the privilege to own. Everyone talks about Sutherland and how stupendous she is. I say that Pavarotti did some of his best singing here as well. His two great arias are better sung than just about anyone, including by the great Alfredo Kraus. Pavarotti did not go for the high E flat in the love duet "Sulla Tomba...Ah, Verrano". But he didn't need to, his sumptuous voice and delicate phrasing of the music is enough to make his Edgardo the best since Richard Tucker. I say Richard Tucker because I first heard La Stupenda sang her Lucia at the Met with Tucker, and I remember the battle of the two big voices. Let me tell you the audience was already going nuts after the love duet, and the second and third act had yet to begin. Needless to say, they were going crazy over Sutherland mainly, giving her ovation over ovation. And deservedly so. She was truly La Stupenda back then. Her Lucia here matches my memory of that glorious night at the lyric theater. The "Regnava nel Silenzio" is better than her earlier set, with far better diction and more involvement. The trills were secure and so is the fioratura. She ends the aria with a Sutherland high D, solid as a rock and brilliant. The duet with Milnes is taken up one full tone to the impossible key of E. And Sutherland crowns the end of the duet with a hugh E natural while Milnes sustain an equally large high A. It is phenomenal! After a rousing sextet which has no equals, La Stupenda sings up a mad scene that always bring tears to my eyes. Her involvement in this 1971 Lucia is much more dramatic than in her earlier set which I also own. She also sings the candenzas much faster in this later set. The trill on the high B flat is done very well, and she ends the first part of the mad scene with a confident and held high E flat. The "Spargi d'amoro pianto" is better than in her first set. She makes the intricately difficult aria seem easy and climaxes with a triumphant high E flat. This is a truly incredibly sung Lucia by all accounts. It reminds me of Sutherland's 1961 debut at the Met. And that, again, brings tears to my eyes. As for her said 30 curtain calls afterwards? I didn't count, I only remember that the ovation lasted more than 45 minutes. I, along with the rest of the audience was complete dumbfounded by singing not heard since the days of Donizetti(if the stories were true about the dramatic coloraturas of the 19th Century). Sutherland is and always will be Lucia. It is her signature role and this recording Lucia is perhaps her finest performance. |
| Comparison map |
| Wondering how the classical music "Donizetti - Lucia di Lammermoor / Sutherland · Pavarotti · Milnes · Ghiaurov · ROH Covent Garden · Bonynge" relates to similar classical music CDs? Find out at a glance here: |
| Price comparison |
![]() Donizetti - Lucia di Lammermoor / Sutherland... |
![]() Verdi - Rigoletto / Sutherland, Pavarotti, Milnes,... |
![]() Donizetti - La Fille du Régiment /... |
![]() Puccini - Turandot / Sutherland ·... |
Puccini: Tosca (complete opera) with Maria Callas,... |
Puccini - La Bohème / Freni,... |
| Our price | $50.98 | $30.49 | $30.49 | $30.49 | $22.97 | $30.49 |
| List price | $50.98 | $33.98 | $33.98 | $33.98 | $32.98 | $33.98 |
| Lowest used price | $23.99 | $9.98 | $13.88 | $15.00 | $4.48 | $12.99 |
| Lowest new price | $29.99 | $15.00 | $15.00 | $19.28 | $19.78 | $19.99 |
| Collectible price | - | - | $34.00 | $33.98 | $32.98 | $34.95 |
| Catalog | Music | Music | Music | Music | Music | Music |
| Release date | 1985-08-12 | 1990-10-25 | 1990-10-25 | 1990-10-25 | 1997-08-19 | 1990-10-25 |
| Media | Audio CD | Audio CD | Audio CD | Audio CD | Audio CD | Audio CD |
| discs number | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Format | Box set | - | - | Box set | - | - |
| Ean | 0028941019325 | 0028941426925 | 0028941452023 | 0028941427427 | 0724355630421 | 0028942104921 |
| Upc | 028941019325 | 028941426925 | 028941452023 | 028941427427 | 724355630421 | 028942104921 |
| Link to shop* (opens in a new window) | BUY IT NOW* | BUY IT NOW* | BUY IT NOW* | BUY IT NOW* | BUY IT NOW* | BUY IT NOW* |
| take one out? |
|
I am here: Home > Classical Music > Featured Performers, A-Z > ( O ) > Donizetti Lucia di Lammermoor Sutherland Pavarotti Milnes Ghiaurov ROH Covent Garden Bonynge
This website will be shutdown on 2008-04-01.
|
|
|
About the Simplest Shop | Help | Term of Use | Privacy Policy
Home | Contact us | Bookmark us | get paid for writing |
|
Copyright Simplest-Shop.com 2004. All rights reserved |